@antonin_d thanks for the early feedback. I’m still working on the draft, but it’s now in a much more readable state.
If OpenRefine were to bundle a native reconciliation service, I believe that would be the most accessible way to make this functionality available to the community (isn't it what #2003 is about?).
Within the scope of this grant application, I envisioned the following workflow where the user
- Downloads a copy of the authority file locally,
- Loads it in OpenRefine as project,
- Configures a local reconciliation by selecting columns and setting scoring rules
- Runs the native reconciliation service.
We’ve planned a design phase during the project to validate what works best for institutions and determine how to package the solution. It could be either as a third-party application, an OpenRefine extension, or integration within OpenRefine core. Feedback from the Core Dev Group is welcome at any stage.
I opened PR #458 to clarify the goal post. When I created the goalpost page I ported the content from Results from the Feature Prioritization Survey 2024 with minimal copy edits to avoid getting bogged down in scoping details for each goal and delaying the page publication.